Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
However, This Posted Correctly And Makes More Sense

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mike Pearson on December 26, 2001 21:55:32 UTC

Quibbling over words is what this thread
was about, in part.
I might have said "Assumptions"
may be previously proven facts.
There's no need to assume the
conditions of a thought experiment...
you pose them, not assume them.

Assumptions bring to mind
the reasoning so other thinkers don't
have to reinvent the wheel.
Soem of this reasoning seems self-evident
but what is self-evident to you might
have been challenged and overturned by
me...or vice versa...and might be completely
unknown to the fans of a few
choice pro football teams which are the
nemisis of our own favorite...but we don't
watch that much do we?
Well, gotta put Bonzo to bed again,
no wait, that's someone else's schtick.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins