Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Numbers In Science Are Half-variables; Must Weigh Consequence

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mike Pearson on December 11, 2001 19:28:06 UTC

Thank you in advance
requesting clarification:
AS I understand it,
no quantity stands alone for discussion in science, or hardly.
All numbers in any other science are place holders (non-technical term, but see if you can see what I am seeing) to be multiplied, divided, added or subtracted from a variable 'x' (or y or z or . . .)
For example:
The distance "1.0(x)" between molecules above
absolute zero temperature is half of a variable, "1.0...(x)"
because they are in motion.
"0.99999...(x)" if it equals "1.0 (x)" , must then mean the numbers are a variable.

and the difference
between 0.99999...(x) and 1.0(x)
in that distance and
on the physical question at hand. The question itself has no universal consequence.

So, whatever we say about the question of whether
"1.0(x) = 0.9999...(x)" is of no consequence
without a physical case, except for _how you want_ to define it.
Innocent of math?
Thank you for your comments in advance.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins