Alexander,

My guess is that if your are at the event horizon as seen by a distant observer, you then look in towards the singulareity of the black hole, and see a point where space is moving away from you towards the singularity at the speed of light. That becomes the new event horizon for an observer on the distant-observered event horizon.

New question: what is the dependence of the speed of space sucked into the singularity as a function of radius?

In a solution for the distant observer and a non-rotating black hole, time becomes the real radial coordinate inside the event horizon. I presume that for the local observer, it becomes real at the new inward shifted event horizon. So by moving the observer into the black hole with the flow of space, we can determine the flow of space throughtout the entire black hole. Do you know if this solution is available?

Richard

• Solutions for inside Schwarzchild.. - bruce - November 28, 2001 - 15:12 UTC
  • I have only seen solutions for distant observer (nt) - yanniru - November 28, 2001 - 16:27 UTC
    • Inside the black hole - bruce - November 29, 2001 - 00:16 UTC
      • correction - bruce - November 29, 2001 - 00:55 UTC
        • I was expecting 2c - yanniru - November 29, 2001 - 14:37 UTC
          • It is the average proper velocity from.. - bruce - November 29, 2001 - 21:24 UTC
            • I did flub.. - bruce - November 29, 2001 - 21:29 UTC
              • Flubber! - luis_hamburgh - November 30, 2001 - 13:58 UTC
                • I do not know GR equations - yanniru - November 30, 2001 - 15:02 UTC
                  • Mass of BH consists of mass of gravity plus BH itself. - alexander - November 30, 2001 - 17:33 UTC
                  • Sometimes light... - bruce - December 1, 2001 - 06:01 UTC
                • I wished I had gone into science as a young man... - bruce - December 1, 2001 - 06:04 UTC
                  • Young Australian LOVES astronomy...! - natwozhere - April 17, 2002 - 04:25 UTC