Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
PhD In BS Detection

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Luis Hamburgh on October 8, 2001 23:15:07 UTC


It's tough to think a theoretical physicist has found enough of an 'establishment' to so boldly speak on behalf of it. It's even tougher to imagine that a competent professional would wield the bravado necessary to purport to speak on behalf of *all* theoretical physicists. Toughest of all is accepting that someone like you, who typically spends two pages explaining a two-line idea, is actually a 'theoretical' anything!

Your numbers may occasionally jibe (meaning you've mastered the "copy" & "paste" functions of your PC), but your demeanor doesn't.


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins