Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Falling Into Black Hole

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Peter Sanderson on September 7, 2001 19:48:35 UTC

Am familiar with the concepts of SR you speak of regarding the event horizon of a black hole,and the premise behind Schwarschilds evaluation.To put it kindly,you miss my point Alex,'the stationary observer far away',is only conscious of
the values and implications of what is seen within the framework of our present knowledge of physics.Albert dealt science a body blow when he rejected quantum theory,saying,'God does not play dice with the universe'The half diameter comment was a flaw,and an undeserving comment by one who I had hoped to exchanged meaningful ideas with.
Peter.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins