: To anyone who reads this don't say what a pile of : Language Removed a least not until you've read it and told me : why it is inaccurate as far a the common theories go.

: If a black hole is a core of super dense matter : with a gravitational density of incalcuable dimensions : and the singularity a point where matter similtanously : exists and is detroyed. Then a Black hole is the ultimate : primordial soup is it not. : If a black hole is created by the collapse of a enormous : energy source in which or due to exists a large : gravitational force field.And the subsequent shrinking : and contraction that creates a black hole must be visable : and therfore act as a marker

:: I just have one question. How can a black whole be the ultimate "primordial soup?" Nothing can live inside a black hole (at least not that we know of). Things are pulled in, but they are immediately destroyed by the incredibly intense gravitational forces (the same thing that pulled an object in in the first place). I mean, given time, and a sufficiently close black hole, it could pull in our entier solar system, and everthing surrounding us. Actually, I have one other question. There are two separate theories (actually, they may be more than theories right now, I'm really not sure) that almost seem to be canceling each other out. One says that the universe is expanding, and the other says that there is a black hole at the senter of our universe. If there really is a black hole at the center of our universe, then wouldn't it be negating the outward expansion of our universe? Also, wouldn't the outward expansion negate the effect of the black hole, therefore keeping our universe stable (neither shrinking nor expanding) until the energy needed to fuel the expansion is expended, and there is no longer any force to keep the black hole in check (from pulling everthing in)?