Why ? - an Astronomy Net Blackholes Forum Message

Blackholes Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Blackholes I \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Why ?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael McNeil on May 6, 2001 03:26:15 UTC

You had no trouble looking him up I trust.

He was very famous in his day. Lot's of people know that. Not a lot of people know why.

Of course to be able to construct a useful criticism one may have to understand his theories. That rules out most people and for all practical purposes everybody else. His theories are still impractical and for the most part useless. So why bother?

Follow Ups:

Einstein SR and GR are useless? Where are you from? - alexander - May 7, 2001 - 17:35 UTC
- Brian kirk Parquette - bkparque - May 31, 2001 - 20:33 UTC
  - einstein 4th spatial straight line dimension -|- einswrwin - bkparque - October 21, 2002 - 19:06 UTC
You missed my point - yanniru - May 7, 2001 - 21:28 UTC
- So what? Special and General relativities are well. - alexander - May 8, 2001 - 00:29 UTC
  - No we are not. - weatherlawyer - September 10, 2001 - 12:09 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins