Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Gibberish

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael McNeil on April 26, 2001 21:43:44 UTC

Rather than try to understand why don't you concentrate on the definitions and try to discern how much of what you believe you believe is hyper hypotheses.

What I am trying to tell you is that nothing (including the maths) is likely to be true if it is based on calculations that are themselves based on theory.

If you would like to sharpen your wits try reading up on the background to the symbol "t" in astrometry calculations.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins