Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button
Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: The Omega Problem

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on February 3, 2001 05:06:04 UTC

How can you claim that GR (General relativity) is incorrect? Do you understand how general relativity works to make such a claim?

In times when GPS system works correctly ONLY if GR is correct, and the speed of gravity has been confirmed to be equal to c to 1% accuracy, this statement is way immature, similar to saying that Newton's gravitation theory F=GMm/R^2 is incorrect.

About omega. You forgot that after annihilation there were plenty of radiation around with the mass exactly equal to the mass of annihilated matter. So total mass/energy of Universe did not change during Big Bang, and omega was likely to be 1 always.

So, there is no need to search for missing mass - it all there.

Thus no need to bother professors or try to resurrect creationism.

But, of course, you can publish paper(s) in theological magazine(s) - they welcome anything in favor.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins