Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Dear PHD's 'Piled Higher And Deeper'

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics
Posted by Brian Kirk Parquette on January 23, 2001 20:25:32 UTC

"As long as there are those who demand and deny proof
of the 4-Dimensional MassField, there will also be those who fail or refuse to recognize the accumulative achievements of historical
and contem-porary Academic Physical Science - and, the lessons of Algebra 101. If all the Nobel laureates in the world gather
together to agree that any entity acknowledged and agreed to be dynamically expanding, can be algebraically squared from any
other entity which is agreed - hysterically insisted upon - to be static and non-expanding (exactly such a gathering exists, and has
existed since 1906): what is dramatically established in such an assemblage of authority is that, none among these mortar-boarded
multitudes has possession of the mathematical ability required to pass the seventh grade.

Patient: ‘What have I got, Doc?’ Dr. : ‘Have you ever had this before?
Patient: ‘Why, yes, I have’. / Dr.: ‘Well. You’ve got it again’. Such a disturbing dynamic would indeed have a dramatically end-less,
prohibitively incredible tendency to expansively spread. The very thought is perishable. On Galvanically wired, Pavlovian bell ringing,
frog’s leg & knee-kicking contact (‘Ostensibly, *everything is not +expanding’. The 4 dimensionally proven experimental results
with its subjectively unprecedented - yet all along - conclusory *object: is discarded the moment +it is 3 dimensionally +subjected. A
kind of liberally practiced scientifically compromised, socially acceptable agreement to compromise; to actively misrepresent the
power and social role, and certainly the limitations of physical science. Instead, become a politically correctionalized, word-warfare
inspired malefactor - an anonymous, nameless, faceless institution of scientific-moral arbitration. As though reality in the human
experience can do without morality. Always the first compromised value, in the construction and maintenance of cor-ruption.
Meanwhile, back in and digressing to mere, yet to be properly interpreted, fancifully escapist 4-dimensionally ‘illusory,
phantom-preoccu-pied, extremely disconcerting reality which has yet to receive proper interpretation..’).

Any Ph.D in physical science who today chooses to
disgrace himself in public contention with the Cosmological Constant: Is deferred to the obliga-tion of professionally kissing the thin
lips of Albert The Ax Einstein’s double bit Lambda. 4 photostatic copies of a quarter for every counterfeit dollar in change-seeker.
At yore command.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins