Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
RE: I Question The Details

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Gerald Dondanville on November 3, 2000 08:07:37 UTC

It is the details that will always be in question, The Big Bang is not comprehensible in classical terms, such as 'explosion'.

Evidence and Arguments Challenging The Big Bang Theory

  • Why the Big Bang is Wrong by John Kierein. "The Big Bang theory of the universe is wrong because the
    cosmological red shift is due to the Compton effect rather than the Doppler effect."

  • Hubble's Constant in Terms of the Compton Effect

  • Big Bang Theory Under Fire by William C. Mitchel

  • Some Big Bang Supporting Assertions Challenged Suave's challenges to Big Bang assertions

  • Big Bang or damp squib - An Alternative Cosmology by
    Chris Lucas

  • Did The Universe Have A Beginning? by Tom Van Flandern

  • Alan Sandage's discussion of Hubble's beliefs

If No Big Bang, What?

  • Endless, Boundless, Stable Universe by Grote Reber

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins