Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
RE: RE: Time/space

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by CL on June 12, 2000 20:27:25 UTC

It is very justifyable to ponder a theory. We ususaly take mathematics to be perfectly accurate in many cases. Mathematics is the key to theory, it seems as though you can prove a theory on mathematics alone but to get the public`s approval (or the scientific community) you must have concrete proof. I think all the answers to the universe can be found within ourselves (ie. thought experiments and mathematical confirmation). Theory is the working desk of science. That`s how we interpret reallity, work out all the kinks, and make it coincide with what we observe. I can see that you, Andy Moore, are a "I have to see it to believe it" type of person and that is perfectly fine. But I always believed in "it`s there whether I have seen it or not" and it`s up to me as a "scientist" to find out what it is and where I can find it before I go looking for it.


Thanks for reading,
CL
(I`m not a scientist)

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins