Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
RE: BlAcK HoLes/big Smang

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by bkparque@usa.net on May 15, 2000 18:02:35 UTC

The Big Bang Universe ‘has a (speculatively presumed ‘super split second’)
beginning’ and a speculatively presumed (entropic ‘heat death’) ‘ending’.
Unlike the Steady State Theory; which for many substantial and eloquent
reasons does not proffer a beginning or ending; which (Steady State Theory)
was abandoned, because the (recently and unexpectedly discovered) proven
expansion of the spatial universe ‘must result; "inevitably" in the
dissipation of occurrent numbers (density) of objects occupying given units
of space over extensively progressive periods of time.’
A Steady State Theory projects a general uniform density of space, rather
than a dissipating space projected in a *Big Bang translation of Universal
History. From the more dense - relatively smaller - past; into the
increasingly less dense and ever-enlarging future. *Space always becoming
more
dissipated with increased passage of time in the spatially expanding, Big
Bang. Which is what is said to ‘inevitably’ result when the dissipating
universe of the present and future, is back-tracked into the conceptualized
universal (consequently ever smaller and more dense) past. Eventually
‘intersecting’ very densely, when and where an explosion (*Big Bang) is
said
to have occurred. Proclaimed by the big bang gang(not to mention NASA) to
be
the cause of the
recently discovered, spatially expanding universe’ - *therefore ‘thinning
out’ with the passage of time.
Big Bang Cosmology. Product of a desperately concocted (1927 emerged,
Henry Silpher discovered, Edwin Hubble refined, Lemaitre generalized), ad
hocly makeshift history.
The big bang theory is ad hoc, in the sense that it was conjured up in
response to the unexpected discovery that the entire spatial universe is
expanding (1927- ‘34).
Back tracking the observed expansion through past time seems to find the
observed expanding universe at a point of convergence - an intersecting
point
where all the matter of the universe was presum-ably joined in one singular
‘cosmic egg’. What seems ‘inevitably’, to be (‘therefore’) a universal
‘beginning’.
Yet, there is, in astrophysically proven and agreed upon fact: no common
center from which the spatially expanding universe recedes.
The expansion is proven, dynamically structured as though the center
(alleged origin of the ‘big bang’ - said to be the beginning cause of the
observed spatial expansion of the universe) is everywhere. No matter the
location of any given observation point: the structural dynamics of the
observed expanding universe are such that always the ‘red-shift’ recession
of
the measurable surrounding universe (of receding objects) is: in direct
line
of sight; moving directly away from points of observation; wherever they
are
located...
Establishing a structural expansion corroborating a physically and
spatially expanding - steady state - universe. Where ‘the center’ is
(‘would
be’) everywhere; as it is in fact observed to be. Proving every point of
mass
(‘charge’/’disturbance’; systems of combined particles) and its (their)
generation of omnidirec-tionally expanding electromagnetism and gravity as
the
collective cause - and ‘origin’ of the observed, red-shift measured
expanding
universe.
The Big Bang imposed retroactive progression to the bygone past’s
intersection of three dimensions to a ‘point of origin’ (the anticipated
‘end’
of retroactively expanding space - traced backwards in time to ‘an
inevitable
intersection’ and consequent point of ‘beginning’), does not apply to a
four
dimensional space-time continuum. The past of which is progressively
smaller,
to endless 4-D infinity, when the observed, spatially expanding (‘Big Bang
originated’; 3-Dimensionally fixated) universe is traced backwards through
past time from the present.
Back tracking the observed spatially expanding universe is popularly said
by Big Bang advocates, to eventually arrive at an intersection where ‘space
ends’: in three dimensions. There is no open argument against the
omniscience
of the four dimensional space time continuum here. It is simply and
altogether
excluded as a solution (refer ‘option’/ AKA, ultimatum). The Big Bang
Theory
denies altogether here, what its perpetrators say they acknowledge...
Meanwhile. The Big Bang Theory instantly goes extinct, when it comes in
contact with the (Invisible, ‘What? ‘) four dimensional space-time
continuum.

Whereas, in four dimensions (when space-time is not excluded from the
universe, as the Big Bang Theory excludes the 4th dimension altogether),
past
space goes on ever-smaller for-ever; smallness proceeding as endlessly as
largeness: with the relativistic center (source of expansion) located
every-where in the occurrence of matter-field ‘particles’ (without a
spatial
limitation at the falsely assumed and foreseen intersection of all matter,
culminating in the alleged explosive ‘begin-ning’); in the
increasingly distant, ever smaller past to infinity, and growing ever
larger
forever in the increas-ingly distant future; to infinity. (Although black
holes have yet to be proven, they are nonetheless extremely controversial
and
have strangely taken the foreground of discussions in theoretical physics..
Their cause - if they exist at all - is not controversial. Presently, with
the
exception of this offering, there are not even any formally submitted
guesses
as to their cause. If black holes exist, until further notice, they are -
ostensibly - the causative result of a contracting four dimensional
space-time continuum; that is to say, a four dimensionally contracting
material system, becoming ever smaller and more dense: to microcosmic
infinity.) The four dimensionally expanding steady state universe
(universal
density) remains always the same relative density; consisting always of the
same amount of energy, increasingly distributed over - creatively becoming
-
an ever en-larging space; from microcosmic infinity, to macrocosmic
infin-ity.
Without infringement on the law of conservation of Mass-Energy 4-D
smallness
(of past space-time) as infinite as 4-D large-ness of future. With the
present
eternally in the middle of micro-cosmic past-smallness and macrocosmic
future
largeness. Whereas, the 3-D pie chart intersects ‘end-space’ where all of
it’s
ever nar-rowing slices come together at the center. A
weightless apple pie, without gravity.
Whereas, the four, five and six dimensional universe demonstrates and
reinstates a (Bondi-Hoyle represented, 1948 introduced, then abandoned),
Steady State universe; without beginning or end. The same amount of
ever-expanding energy distributing itself over in-creasing amounts of space
-
all densities per coordinately system-atized frame of reference remaining
relatively stable and ‘unmoving’, ‘static’, ‘not expanding’: relative to
all
other comparably expanding material in a given coordinate system - to
infinity. ‘Disturbed areas’, ‘spreading indefinitely.’ Generating 4-D
space-time:

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins