Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: Twin Paradox

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Luciano Medina/">Luciano Medina on August 28, 1998 08:50:07 UTC

As "bouwe" says in his reply, the twin paradox is not as Mark explains. It can be better understood if we imagine two space ships, A and B. A is "not moving" and B passes by at a high constant speed. According to the relativity theory, from A's point of view, B's clock is running slower. But from B's point of view, he is quiet and A is moving, so A's clock is running slower. There is no way to decide who is moving and who is not, because "movement" is a relative concept that depends on the observer. So if B turns back and reaches A (or viceversa) and they compare their clocks, which of them will late? I don't know the answer yet, so for me it IS a paradox.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins