I posted in God and Science about this question more in relation to the nature of time? Is it definite that there is spacetime? Has anybody heard of these conjectures I recently had:
(1) There is only space that holds all we can see in the Universe, but Time is a separate element and cannot exist in space. Time does exist in the Universe but it excludes space, and in its realm are "things" associated with it. Because the Universe breaches possibilities, the realm of Time is in what appears to be our past. For that matter space has no time elements, and the future is no time, or meaningless. There is no possible way to travel time because we would enter an actual realm of the past that has no space, even though it is part of the Universe. This realm of Time further may be acting in "eroding" something like "probability" or "anti-probability"...who knows? The immediate "now" has no time, the future is an imaginary concept, but the past has Time that is without space. And this Time exists where all possibilities that could have happened for the Universe became "set in stone" so-to-speak.
(2) There is a spacetime, but does space and time decouple? If there was an observer within a domain of spacetime when it decouples, it would be unnoticeable because the observer would be embedded. Could this decoupling explain why the Universe might remain knit together while expansion would have the tendency to fragment the Universe into separate domains; or could it expain Dark Matter and Energy in the sense that radiation may acquire mass within this decoupled spacetime as seen from the outside?
Has anybody postulated something like these two conjectures on my part? If anybody has heard something like this or approaching this, can they direct me to it? |