Even the guy who claims to be "the smartest man on the planet," and who has "proved" the existence of God with something called the CTMu, has done so by assuming there MUST be a WHO.

Big indicator, in my opinion, that Chris Langan is certainly NOT the smartest man on earth is his reason for thinking this way - read anything he's written and it becomes obvious that to him the most important question of all time is WHY. But a lot of people are beyond that emotional crutch-like model of thought. Anyone seeking a "why" is doomed to invent a WHO. Apparently Langan is not smart enough to see that.

HOW allows for a natural law, and if you can think around the WHY prejudice then there's no need to go beyond HOW.

• Natural law, how? - eventhorizen - July 18, 2003 - 15:22 UTC
  • You've made my point very well - budbock - July 21, 2003 - 14:40 UTC
• The HOW is the AWESOME wonder. - bible_believer3 - October 9, 2003 - 17:26 UTC