Back to Home

Bigbang Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Big Bang | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Bud Bock on July 17, 2003 17:54:39 UTC

Even the guy who claims to be "the smartest man on the planet," and who has "proved" the existence of God with something called the CTMu, has done so by assuming there MUST be a WHO.

Big indicator, in my opinion, that Chris Langan is certainly NOT the smartest man on earth is his reason for thinking this way - read anything he's written and it becomes obvious that to him the most important question of all time is WHY. But a lot of people are beyond that emotional crutch-like model of thought. Anyone seeking a "why" is doomed to invent a WHO. Apparently Langan is not smart enough to see that.

HOW allows for a natural law, and if you can think around the WHY prejudice then there's no need to go beyond HOW.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins