Back to Home

ATM Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Amateur Telescope Making | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
AArgh!

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Robert May on October 19, 2004 19:16:43 UTC

The ol' choice between two different scope designs is here again!
The problem is that one person may consider that the color problems with refractors to be worse than the roughness of a Mak design.
Personally, I'd go with another refractor with a longer focal length as this does two things for the scope. It increases the image scale which makes high power views easier to obtain with the eyepieces available. Note that there is a 50x per inch basic resolution limit which says that you're going to be seeing no more than 250x before "empty" magnification starts happening.
With the Mak, the central obstruction will decrease contrast slightly as well as drop the brightness of the image a little bit compared to the refractor of the same size.
One person will enjoy one scope more than the other but I'd suggest that if you are considering a 5" refractor, take the same amount of money and go for a reflector of a larger size for about the same amount of money.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins