|
|
|||||
|
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
Telescope May Not Be The Expensive Part
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by James Phillips on September 25, 2004 15:58:48 UTC |
Just to lend a little credibility I have almost completed a masters degree in Electro Optics with a focus in atmospheric trubulence. You con build a scope that will do what you want with no problem, the major expenses are the tracking system and the Adaptive Optics he uses. He has a Fast Steering Mirror to remove the tip tilt aberations from the images, this accounts for around 83% of you total error in the image. I am sure (although I did not check) he also uses a very fast research grade camera to limit the other aberations. Rather than take a long exposure take many short exposures and stack them ( a free program to do this is astrostack). If you can afford the Dome, the AO and a good camera you could almost take the images through most any telescope. Hope this helps. If I can help any other way email me at jphillips97@auburnalum.org. Good Luck |
|
Additional Information |
---|
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |