Back to Home

ATM Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Amateur Telescope Making | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
RE: Baffling Developments, And More.......

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Walter Hamler on April 18, 2000 00:23:09 UTC

A recent issue of S&T that compared 8" dobsonians, commercial variety) had some answers to these and other questions. Basically, take the focuser height, racked in, + 1~1.5 inch, + the radius of the tube diameter, and divide the sum by the mirror f/ratio. Then add 0.5" for planetary use or 1" for photo field light coverage. There are other, more complicated math ways to compute, but the answer is almost always going to fall in between sizes available, so you kinda hafta choose!!
AFA baffles are concerned, I`ve seldom seen them used in newtonians. Never really thought or were told that they are necessary, as in refractors. Can`t even say why?? Anyone else out there know a real answer??

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins